The Baha'i Studies Listserv
to some degree.
 i am not near so generous.
   snce lyris is telling me my previous reply did not post,  i offer it again. 
if the daemons of the machines do find it, forgive the extra bandwidth.

eloaborate???
 rotfl... oy.
  i am in the midst of assembling a rather scathing attack--hopefully for 
publication-- on "intelligent design" as bandied about n th usa.
 and i would offer that if u went to
http://www.dobahaisthink.com/1033/apes-soul/
 you could find links to a 340+ post discussion of >>part<< of the issue.

 and i further encourage anyone here to use that site's search feature anytime 
they are curious as to any possible conversations had on about any topic.
 that project is now in beta.
  they may be useful for teaching. they are definitely useful, based on the 
alpha testing, for impriving the odds on uninformed seekers being more able to 
find signal than the noise put out by random wannabis, "unenrolled" ..etcetcetc.

 but i digress...no, i don;t :-)

>>>darwin<<< for %*%*sakes stated that 
"Therefore I should infer from analogy that probably all the organic beings 
which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial 
form, into which life was first >>>breathed<<<."
 (emphasis, lol, mine)

so, "classical darwinism" states that all
 plants, animals, etc have the same ancestor.

  in he past 20whatever years, it has been noted rather emphatically that this 
"ancestor" is still around in form like
http://www.experienceholidays.co.uk/dynamicdata/data/Australia/Western%20Australia/Hamelin%27s%20Pool%20Stromatolites%20Western%20Australia.jpg
 or

http://images.travelpod.com/users/steph_nico/3.1246525603.me-stromatolites.jpg
 (the one in white here is a different life form)

in more "neo-darwinism" terms, >>dna itself<< is the "evolving form". 
 >materialist< "neodarwinism" asserts, factually, that random laws of 
 >probabiity and the laws of electro-magnetic parity, etc sufficiently account 
 >for the presence of stromatolites, michael jackson, and ivory towers. 
  thus clearly, (th way i am running it), within the most materialistic 
construct, an order of laws "logos" is the common ancestor, "father", combining 
with matieral on which to operate, "mother"... and gee, now we have invented 
the pre-Adamic cycle's theology, as well as "modern neo-paganism" and 
materialistic "science". 

to work a serpentine path, one may note that the Master speaks of each kingdom 
having its own life and properties....something the wannabe modernists tend to 
reject about minerals.
however, note that what "science actually says" conforms closely here to the 
Master:
http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/428/lifes-working-definition

 the Master (in my irrelevant interpretation) ponits directly to to commonality 
og ancestor when noting that it was well known that each human attempted to  
recreate successfully the voyage from oceanic one-celled-->gilled-->tailed 
etc., as evidence of evolution, and elsewhere defines "human behaviour" as the 
discovery of underlying characterisitics, etc. --not the possession of a 
hairless and ineffective bipedalism. 
   

and the Blessed Beauty Speaks of
"The world of existence came into being through the heat generated from the 
interaction between the active force and that which is its recipient. These two 
are the same, yet they are different. Thus doth the Great Announcement inform 
thee about this glorious structure."

thus, the above is flaoting on relatively solid ice both as material science 
and from the Faith's Texts.

for more on "junk" and commanality, u may wish to read:
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/info.shtml

or just start googling, lest u take my word for anything.

taxonomy:
   linnaues, and others before and after, gathered groups of organisms onto a 
tree of life based on >>shape<< rather than function.

 thus, linaues notes:
"But I seek from you and from the whole world a generic difference between man 
and simian that [follows] from the principles of Natural History. I absolutely 
know of none. If only someone might tell me a single one! If I would have 
called man a simian or vice versa, I would have brought together all the 
theologians against me. Perhaps I ought to have by virtue of the law of the 
discipline."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape#History_of_hominoid_taxonomy

which will aslo clue as to the "camp" of evolution noting chemical properties 
and actions as the correct taxonomy for drawing the tree of life.

foxp2....
 the operation of this gene, in random places within the brain seems 
"responsible" for language..the ability to have pavlov's bell/food thing be 
"real".
  th way i am viewing it, is is a key to "abstraction."
   
 life >>>does<<<. 

it doesn't "have". it is a perceptual error to think so.

the T&G strongly suggest to me that after paroling out of here..some process 
keeps processing, with such tasks as recongising loved ones, suffering, 
delighting, whatever...precisely the same way t does now. the same behaviour, 
including language, "morality" "custom" "the yasa" can be observed in species 
ranging from humans, to elephants, to mice.
 indeed, such behaviours as "mother as first educator" "proper to mourn for th 
dead and visit their resting place" "go psycho at seeing mother die" "sacrifice 
for children" "respect for parents' point of view" "obey the consultation" 
"give respect to the learned" and "work for the good of the whole, not the 
individual or the subset"  are more evident in elephants than most communities 
i have been around. 
   and the >>behaviour<< endures to the extent it builds "elephantness" or, 
sigh, "healthy Baha'i community" regardless of what happens to any particular 
clump of walking dust. when the bahviour is faulty, the the elephant pack or 
"Bahai community" perishes.
   Islam does not mean "have a Qu'ran"--it means an action: surrender.
  i offer that the 'i in Baha'i does not mean "have a stairway to heaven"--it 
means "coming from" or "following" the Splendour/Glory.
  th answer is yes? the answer is always yes.
:"Such as communicate the generating influence and such as receive its impact 
are indeed created through the irresistible Word of God which is the Cause of 
the entire creation, while all else besides His Word are but the creatures and 
the effects thereof. Verily thy Lord is the Expounder, the All-Wise."



__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [email protected]
Or subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to