Heya Elwood,
lol,    the Penn V 10-142-95....in the 2Q Call to Earnings, they said
that it came online at 650+ bopd, and that after finish work, they
expected another 200+ or so in addtl daily....ever hear how that
turned out?
Why would Anschutz NOT stage frac??

On Oct 7, 9:54 am, elwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if i may be so bold to ask, oh gladiator of the internet,  which penn
> v well are you refering to ?
>
> On Oct 5, 5:41 pm, "Rufus O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In listening to the recent batch of hearings on the Anschutz requests,
> > when queried by the NDIC board about whether or not they plan to stage
> > frac their upcoming drilling, the engineers said they are still
> > considering the data from Marathon's unlined, single stage fracs
> > delivering 'good' results in Dunn, to the data from the Swell Packer
> > lining with multiple staged fracs. And that they are 'leaning' toward
> > the staged fracing... but it cost another million on top of the 4.5
> > million drilling cost.
> > What kind of  'good' production numbers  are coming from the Marathon
> > wells doing unlined and single fracs?
> > I just cannot believe with the production of Penn V, and others using
> > 9-12 stage fracs that they would even consider sinking the 4.5 on the
> > risk of low-moderate-'good' production vs. outstanding production with
> > the lined/multi.
> > With the dismal results Anschutz got with their early bakken wells,
> > why would they not just go Multi-stage
> > I do not understand the corporate or technical thinking on that
> > 'unlined' option?
> > opinions anybody?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Bakken Shale Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to