În data de Mi 25 mai 05 la 17:31, Peter Bloomfield a scris:
On 05/25/2005 03:29:01 AM, Misu Moldovan wrote:
[snip]
Oddly enough, when I answer to your mail in Balsa, the compose
window is empty, I had to copy and paste your reply in the compose
window and indent it manually (arrghhh).
That's strange! It was delivered to you by the list-server, right?
I have a copy delivered the same way, and can reply to it normally.
Could you forward me a copy of what you received? I'll compare it
with mine.
Best,
Peter
See attach. I am able to reproduce the problem by saving the file in
.mail/ and trying to reply to the this mail as seen in the newly found
mbox (after a manually initiated rescan of the mailboxes).
Using Balsa 2.3.2 manually compiled in an up-to-date Ubuntu Hoary.
Locale settings are ro_RO (iso-8859-2).
--
Mişu
From wwwrun Sat May 21 13:49:34 2005
Received: (qmail 26969 invoked from network); 21 May 2005 10:49:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO menubar.gnome.org) (12.107.209.248)
by 133.home.ro with SMTP; 21 May 2005 10:49:33 -0000
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CA8F33B073A; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248])
by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 18088-03; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menubar.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D23B43B06B3; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830343B000D
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([12.107.209.248])
by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 17938-07 for <[email protected]>;
Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net
[205.152.59.67])
by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9E73B066B
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([68.221.97.83])
by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:10 -0400
Received: from Mercury ([68.221.97.83]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net
(InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 07:08:10 -0400
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:08:06 +0000
From: Peter Bloomfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Balsa List <[email protected]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu
May 19 01:00:10 2005)
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
Subject: Re: New mails in mailboxlist
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Balsa email client <balsa-list.gnome.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: </archives>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on homesql64.rdsnet.ro
On 05/19/2005 01:00:10 AM, Steffen Klemer wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I saw that you recently changed the way of mailboxhandling. The =20
> new-mail-count is now saved between sessions. While this is a =20
> nice soultion for systems where only balsa receives new mail I =20
> would vote for a (at least configureable) complete check wether =20
> the mbox has changed since the last session or not.
Hi Steffen!
For local mailboxes, Balsa from cvs now saves a time-stamp for =20
the mailbox as well as the message counts, so mailbox changes =20
since the last session should be detected the first time the =20
mailbox is checked. I don't have the kind of delivery you =20
use--could you test it?
Hi Mi=C5=9Fu!
IMAP mailboxes are a bit more of a problem. IMAP servers have a =20
mechanism for detecting changes, but the overhead (a STATUS =20
request) is essentially the same as checking the mailbox, so your =20
best solution is probably to check "Check IMAP mailboxes" and =20
uncheck "Check INBOX only".
Peter
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
