-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey everyone,
I've just noticed that the GtkHTML 3.6 packages have now been uploaded
into Debian (unstable) as part of our transition to GNOME 2.10.
Balsa was last built against libgtkhtml3.2, and I'm wondering if Balsa
has been battle-proven with 3.6 yet? The last time I tried a switch
from 3.0 to 3.1 without consulting anyone proved a disaster! Hence my
wariness when it comes to such upgrades = )
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & Computer Science, UNSW
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCqmEQmyTAfS6LaL0RAvQWAJ9aqTDQdGu7DxuM1cgjVfBp9Li/EwCfU70P
4C5GpYasiH3qAzOnVynGyzw=
=kXnV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
