On 07/11/2005 01:12:39 AM, Johan Brannlund wrote:
[ snip ]
To me, this doesn't seem like a very compelling reason. After all,
it's not like it's hard to create spoofed e-mail headers manually.
True. But it's in the spirit of RFC 2822 ("In all cases, the "From:"
field SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that does not belong to the
author(s) of the message."), and there's the convenience of setting the
header and the identity in one step.
[ snip ]
I'm not sure how hig-compliant balsa is
It is in some ways compliant but overall it's just a bunch of good
will and nice ideas of the developers... ;)
I think especially the menus and the prefs-window should be
redesigned a bit...
I too sometimes find the menus a bit counter-intuitive, but I can't
really put my finger on why.
I believe that Balsa has no HIG-csar, but we try to fix the most
obtrusive non-compliance when it's pointed out. Reactions from a fresh
set of eyes are most useful--regular users get used to just about
anything!
Peter
_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
