On 05/05/07 17:02:26, Nuno Monteiro wrote: > On 2007-04-14 19:52, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > [snip snip] >>> >>> But you can now read all that spam without crashing Balsa? >> Yes yes I can open them ;) (I don't read them) without crashing balsa >> what is fine! >> > > Sorry for rehashing an old thread, but while sifting through my > 'attic' mailbox (where I keep really old stuff) I came accross a > couple of emails that crash Balsa with exit code 01, much like > Jean-Luc's spams. They also have broken headers (attached, for your > perusal), but Balsa 2.3.8 from Ubuntu 6.06 seems to eat them just > fine without any complaints -- both mine and Jean-Luc's. > > So, I tried building a vanilla 2.3.8 (didn't build, had to dig some > GOption patch from Debian bug-tracker) to rule out the chance of any > patch from Ubuntu fixing the crash, and kept going because all > vanilla versions up to and including 2.3.14 worked fine. 2.3.15, > however, crashed every time. > > With that info I did a little binary searching (how I wish svn had > something like git bisect!), and starting with commit 7544, which is > v2.3.14 -- it doesn't appear to be tagged in svn as such, although > .13 and .15 are, strangely -- I discovered that it is commit 7578 > that starts the crashes. Commit 7577 works flawlessly, both with my > broken mails from Invision Power Board and with Jean-Luc's spams.
1. what happens if you configure balsa --without-libnotify? 2. Is imap involved in any way? Pawel _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
