On 20 Oct, 2011, at 18:55 , Jack wrote: >> Thanks for your reply! This sounds like the opposite of what should happen, >> right? > Well - to be picky, -o says open mailbox, not select mailbox, although it > would make sense to select a mailbox if you explicitly say to open it.
What would "open" possibly mean other than show/select it? All the mailboxes are always sitting there anyway. > I'm not sure I would expect balsa to try to open a mailbox it doesn't know > exists. Me neither. I discovered by accident that it works in 2.4.1. I'd be perfectly happy being able to open previously added mailboxes. But then I don't really see the point of specifying an URI, a name would be sufficient. Anyway, I won't complain about any idiosyncracies if it just works ;-) > Unless one of the developers can think of what commit might have caused this > change in behavior, it might take a bisection approach to identify it. Or I just use 2.4.1 until I hit a serious bug... Konrad. _______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
