[ooc: Hmm I think that the CPS can level the Charge, it is the Minister of
Justice who actually judges
guilt or innocence of the case of embezzlement.  But a ruling from Greg
might be in order as there are
several charges to answer for. And the CPS needs to present the Ministry of
Justice with the evidence
for all charges]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BANANA DIGEST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: BANANA: CdC to MoS, MoJ, CoE; (Re:An arrest!)


> Brigadier le Duc Coward de Custaad, OC Horse Guards Brigade, to
> His Majesty's Esteemed:  Minister of State, Minister of
> Justice  &  Chancellor of The Exchequer
>
> Greetings!
>
> I write concerning the quite inappropriate machinations of the
Commissioner
> of Public Safety, however utilitarian he may feel his actions may
> be.  Having served for some time in His Majesty's Government including the
> premier fiscal positions of Minister of Finance and Marine and Chancellor
> of the Exchequer I was always aware of the possibility of embezzlement, a
> charge now levelled at His Excellency the Minister of State.  However, in
> my understanding of the official capacities held by His Excellency there
> would have been no possibility for His Excellency to have embezzled a
> single crown.  Additionally such a charge of embezzlement should only be
> dealt with by the Minister of Justice alone.
>
> What has therefore transpired is that Commissioner has put forward a bogus
> charge of embezzlement, which even if it were possible for His Excellency
> the Minister of State to have committed (which as we all know it is not)
> would not even be within the limit of authority of the Commissioner to
make
> such a charge and in attempting to do so would cast great doubt on the
> validity of his other charges.
>
> I am not currently an active part of His Majesty's government as you are
> all well aware, but due to my past service to His Majesty's Government I
> will make testimony, if required, to the effect that the authority of the
> His Majesty's Minister of Justice has been usurped.   I do not believe His
> Majesty would tolerate a "judicial usurper" and would like to suggest that
> the Minister of Justice may care to explain (for the public record) the
> correct procedure in such alleged cases to the Commissioner so that he may
> dispense with this most dubious charge of embezzlement directly.
>
> Kind regards,
> Duc Coward de Custaad
>
> PS.  While some of us may have had slight disagreements in the past I am
> sure we all stand firmly together as far as His Majesty's Divine Justice
is
> to be administered according to His Majesty's own wishes and the Law.
>
>
> [OOC:
> As I understood the rules (house rules, section 8.1) all embezzlement
> charges where to be dealt with by the Minister of Justice.  Has this
changed? ]
>
>
> At 13:48 25/01/2003  Saturday -0500, you wrote:
> >[OOC: The Commissioner of Public Safety arrests of Duc Alain
deMylcondonai
> >on the charges of treasonous slander against the Crown [two counts],
gross
> >negligence of his duties, embezzlement of the King's funds, and the
murder
> >of Baron Noir leBlanc]
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.humf.su.se/mailman/listinfo/banana


_______________________________________________
Banana mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.humf.su.se/mailman/listinfo/banana

Reply via email to