Hello Navin, On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Navin Kabra<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No not yet. I am not building a application where every mu-sec >> matters. I appreciate the link and comments though. Will be helpful >> some day in the future.
I hope I did not sound too terse. I *really* do appreciate the pointers. Sorry, If I did. > > I guess my point is this: > > If you've chosen python as a language for your app, you have pretty > much accepted that your application is not CPU bound. Hence you should > not be worrying about the extra CPU cycles taken by advanced languages > features. Use all possible language features (focusing on readibility > and maintainability and other such things). Don't worry about the CPU > performance unless there is a need to worry about, and even then, you > should be thinking in terms of replacing a key function with C code > rather than replacing a generator with a for loop. Yeah. Right now, I am just exploring these concepts in Python simply because its so easy to do it in this language. I am anticipating some Python development coming up, and in the not too distant past, I had started coding a software tool (a Fuzzy reasoning tool), knowing very few Python-ic features. I don't want to repeat the same stupidity. Thanks again! Best Regards, Amit > > navin. > _______________________________________________ > BangPypers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers > -- Journal: http://amitksaha.wordpress.com, ยต-blog: http://twitter.com/amitsaha Freenode: cornucopic in #scheme, #lisp, #math,#linux, #python _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
