On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Vishal <vsapr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, what I meant was: Everyone knows its an interpreted language and we
> are choosing it for its productivity. Also, since its interpreted, its
> performance will not / most probably not match that with compiled
> languages...so any news in increase in performance is a giantly welcome
> thing. Sometimes it also acts as a metric when choosing between different
> dynamic languages (especially by managers, who are not going to develop and
> not going to be in love with a particular language anyways)
> Hence, the performance query...
>

Speed matters.  To programmers.  So there's no need for the legal disclaimers.

Roshan Mathews
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Reply via email to