On 18 May 2011 18:25, Sirtaj Singh Kang <sir...@sirtaj.net> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, Sree. If I might pick your brain further - > > On 18-May-11, at 6:13 PM, Sreekanth S Rameshaiah wrote: > [snip] > > We have used it in one large scale project which is due to go live in next >> few days. >> > > What was the reasoning behind choosing it over apache+mod_wsgi? What are > the deal-breaker features that you'd miss if you went back to mod_wsgi?
If we had our say, we would have settled for apache+ mod_wsgi. Client was techie organisation and they felt nginx + uwsgi will perform better. Our research showed that in a fully dynamic environment it makes no difference. In a usecase where lot of static (both text/ binary) content get served, there may be performance gain in nginx + uwsgi. We just follow the client's directive as both almost had similar performance. - sree _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
