On 2 May 2013 23:21, Venkatraman S <venka...@gmail.com> wrote: > [I posted this in one more forum...but thought would share my enthusiasm > here too...:) ] > > I have been playing around uWSGI (for a django app) for a few days now and
We have switched to nginx + uWSGI for our Django projects, in preference to the more standard Apache + mod_wsgi. Yet to do real benchmarking, but initial results show a significant gain in performance. > i must say that Spooler has been one of the best finds. I haven't done any > benchmarking yet, but the ease of use is so darn good that I am extremely > impressed. I was planning to use celery+redis, but this makes things so > easy that i do not have to take care of anything else. I think this would > work just fine for most of the websites/webapps that are not expecting a > gazillion hits/tasks. > > I love simple but powerful constructs(another e.g Django's content-types), > and Spooler was one such. [...] Haven't looked at the uWSGI spooler yet, as things that we need offline tasks for, such as mail, use Celery which is better supported by Django apps, e.g., django-celery-mail. uWSGI is interesting. Besides the base features, we will also be looking at its caching performance, auto-scaling, and asynchronous access. Regards, Gora _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
