> > On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 14:27 +0100, david blanchard wrote: > > [David] Thanks, I've looked at it. I agree with Xav that all cards > > should have the same structure though, the difference being the > > sentence used. So we first need to agree on a final and common layout > > before the pdf can be finished, we're almost there. > > Xavier, how about : grey and white on the text side (like p.12 of the > > pdf), and picture on the other side (like p.7), would you be ok with > > that ? > > Yup - if it's ok for everyone too, I could go for this version yes. [David] Good - Deb, can you pleae prepare the final pdf then ?
> > My point here is not to create a bad precedent for future > > contractors - we still need to decide how we split and release > > paiements in general by the way. > > Xav I'd like your opinion too, what do you think ? > > I think there will always be reasons that create delays, and often it > will be for reasons that don't directly depend on a given contractor. I > think in the majority of cases we should wait for the job to be > finished > anyway - expect when it creates huge delays like here, where a partial > payment seems fair. > [David] So you and I agree. Deb is it ok for you ? _______________________________________________ Farsides mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://farsides.com/ List: http://farsides.com/ml/ Forum: http://farsides.com/forum/ Ideas: http://farsides.com/ideas/ Chat: http://farsides.com/chat/
