De : david blanchard [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi 13 août 2010 12:17 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [HackIt Bar] [Article] Autonomy & Management Probably setting objectives would be a good first step - it allows to make it clear for everyone what is expected, and then we can build the rest on top of it. I've prepared a first template for the setting and review of objectives -> http://community.hackit.cx/wiki/Individuals_-_Objectives_and_performance_rev iews I've given some examples of technical skills development only for art, as an example. Once we agree on the template, I can complement it with other jobs. Right now I only went with a 'qualitative' appraisal with no scoring. I could add a scoring (like 'below expectations', 'meets expectations', 'exceeds expectations', etc), this would make things easier for bonus distribution but it also can generate lots of discussions because it depends on the personality of the reviewer (the person who has the A on the appraisal of the contractor), not everyone has the same standards. But given that everything is discussed publically and everyone can appraise the work of his peers and discuss it with the reviewer, a balance can appear that makes the scoring a good thing to implement. What do you think ? thx D
_______________________________________________ Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/ List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/ Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/ Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/ IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
