On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:22 +0200, david blanchard wrote:
> Xav I tried to upload it on the wiki but the format was not accepted.
> Actually we could build a wiki document instead of using an openoffice doc,
> but there will be some reformatting to do when we use it for official
> purpose (registering them). What do you think would be the most convenient ?
It will be a recurring issue, so it could be a good opportunity to start
tackling it. I think the best would be to keep everything on the wiki,
and work on the exports. Aside from "save as PDF" from the browser, we
could look at Wikimedia plugins to see what we could do, and eventually
adapt one to our needs. What do you think?
> There are many points that need to be discussed together and then rewritten
> by a lawyer, but I wanted to have a first draft in order to start the
> discussion.
* Needs a larger object, to allow *everything* we could
potentially do, even when it's very unlikely (things like
publishing books, movies, exhibitions, etc.). It avoids having
to change the statuses when we want to do something that hadn't
been originally planned
* Number of shares - why can't we have it with 1 euro? 50 euros is
weird ;p
* Association - issue of creating it *and* it bank account, as the
checks with the right names will be needed for the creation of
the company
* Think we should be careful about the obligation for the company
to buy a shareholder that wants to go out (founders or
investors), it could put the company in a difficult position if
this happens at the wrong moment. Don't know how it works best,
but maybe something among the lines of: the one who wants out
can, but unless the board agrees to his plan, he has to sell it
to the company at the current valuation, but would only get the
money later, when some objectives relative to the availability
of liquidity are met.
* Determine the valuation by expert in case of disagreement - ok,
but who is the expert, how is it chosen?
* About changing the "domiciliation" of the company - I've heard
it helps to include a clause about this, since it can avoid
having to republish the status when it happens
> I think the next step is soon to hand it over to a lawyer to help us because
> we really need the help of someone. We could ask Olivier and a couple of
> other lawyers (I can ask Jérôme) and then decide ?
Yup - we could see a few bids. But if Olivier has a reasonable rate, I
would be comfortable handing this over to him as part of a bigger
package.
Xavier.
_______________________________________________
Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected]
Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/
List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/
Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/
Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
