Zitat von Stanislav German-Evtushenko <[email protected]>:

On Friday, November 7, 2014 5:57:31 PM UTC+3, [email protected] wrote:
Zitat von Stanislav German-Evtushenko <[email protected]>:

> Does it make sense to talk about concurrency when it is accessed by
> the only process (bareos on our case) ?
>

To my knowledge you have one db connection per running job and some
more for example per bconsole and the like, so yes concurrency could
also be a point to take care of.

But as always YMMV

Regards

Andreas

At the same time when you have the only single tape drive (means no concurrent jobs) and backups are only performed at non-working time it doesn't seem be a big issue for me.

However documentation doesn't say "you can use sqlite3 in some cases", instead it says "only for testing". So I wonder if there are some serious issues with bareos/sqlite3 that we should know about.

It should read "if it fails you are on your own", so if you doesn't care you can go that road. But as said i have never need to do any housekeeping or maintenance with PostgreSQL, so there is no need to tinker with SQlite beside the case that you need to save any kb of RAM you can find maybe.

Regards

Andreas


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to