For your information, I now had Bareos perform a full backup of a real production server using the GlusterFS storage backend. This is really a great feature and I am looking forward to put this into production.
I even used the bacula-fd client on the server which was already running as I already have a Bacula server. Even this worked without having to install the Bareos FD client. Really pleased about that too. At the end I backed up 121 GB at a rate of 17.51 MB/s which is not bad considered this server has SATA disks. The Gluster server during the backup performed very silently, low CPU usage and especially 1/4 of context switches in comparison to the crappy FUSE client. Thumbs up to Bareos! Now I will start scaling out by adding more clients and hopefully the Gluster storage backend also allows for concurrent backups. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bareos-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
