On 2/6/19 11:29 AM, 'Michael Stum' via bareos-users wrote: > I've done some more digging with this, and it seems that doing a backup > to disk is saner for my scenario.
We do really love always incremental jobs. They are exceptionally light on the clients. The consolidation jobs can be large, but they only run on the backup server, they don't involve the clients at all. > For now, I've setup an Always Incremental backup with the Tape Drive as > the long-term storage, and will look into the VirtualFull solution > (which seems to require a different job per actual backup job). Yup, the virtual fulls are separate jobs. We run always incrementals against our clients between 1 and 4 times a day, depending on the client. And then we do the tape backups via virtual full jobs once a week. Those tapes, for us, go off-site. Our backup server is the only thing involved with the virtual full jobs, which is nice. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bareos-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
