Am 23.04.19 um 04:11 schrieb Lv Haijiao: > Hi Community Users > > In our case, we use Bareos to backup file server which has a huge number of > files in some folders. > > The target directory has 1,620,775 files, 1.598 TB. While we enable the > incremental backup, it's noted Bareos took about 14+ hours to complete the > incremental backup though only 7.6GB data were actually backup-ed, most of > hours(99%) was spent on comparison. How did you find out that this was "comparison" and what comparison are you talking about?
[...] > We understand it's pretty normal to take some time to compare during > incremental backup, however it's just too long. For the same folder and > volume, Bacula only needs about 3 hours for incremental backup. Did you try Bacula or Bacula Enterprise? Did you use the exact same configuration for Bacula? Because I doubt that Bacula will be 5 times faster with the same configuration. > would much appreciated if anyone can share how to fine tune the BareOS > incremental backup performance. Do you have accurate enabled? Can you show your fileset (especially the accurate flags and wildcard/regexp includes and excludes) Best Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Rogge [email protected] Bareos GmbH & Co. KG Phone: +49 221-630693-86 http://www.bareos.com Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln | Amtsgericht Köln: HRA 29646 Komplementär: Bareos Verwaltungs-GmbH Geschäftsführer: S. Dühr, M. Außendorf, J. Steffens, Philipp Storz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bareos-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
