There are probably pros and cons on each for each of those approaches.
If you connect it to the hypervisor, you abstract the connectivity layer
so you're more flexible in case you ever want to migrate storage
elsewhere. Same but opposite ;-) goes for connecting it to the VM - you
don't have to worry about hypervisor configuration. That's the most
important aspect here I think. Performancewise if you're using
paravirtualized drivers it shouldn't make that much of a difference.
On 13.10.2022 15:16, Sean Hurley wrote:
I have successfully performed a backup/restore. Success!
I have 30TB of iscsi storage to assign to my BareOS install running as
a VM. Is it wiser to allow the VM to directly connect to the storage
or to assign it as a volume through the host? I'm thinking of
performance and reliability.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions and tips.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "bareos-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/068e374c-54dd-40c3-85a1-8e9cedab7846n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/068e374c-54dd-40c3-85a1-8e9cedab7846n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"bareos-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/00d60627-ef36-f47a-887c-47d73fdf687f%40gmail.com.
