I got a little confused when I wrote the server name. I meant that the database size of the old CT-BAREOS01 server, which is more than 2 years old, is larger than the new VL-BAREOS02 (1 month of use). CT-BAREOS01 has much more VMs backups than VL-BAREOS02, but the database size is smaller
вторник, 3 декабря 2024 г. в 14:43:22 UTC+6, Silvio Schloeffel: > Hi Ramil, > > you wrote your old server has more backup files (files to backup in my > mind). > The size of the file table says something different. > Have you done a simple count over the file table to look for the number > of entries? > Eventually you backuped more files as expected on the new system. > -> a lot of small files will not grow the used media size but the > filesize and the infos to store will be a lot more > > Best > > Silvio > > > Am 03.12.24 um 09:25 schrieb Ramil: > > pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(relid)) AS total_size > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bareos-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bareos-users/fab8132e-e880-484f-a5f3-d30dd175e718n%40googlegroups.com.
