Thanks Markus, it did go astray.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Lutz" <mar...@gmlutz.de>
To: "A. J. Ness" <arthurjn...@verizon.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Ms. Lei. II 6 14 ?


Hi Arthur,
seems as if this email should be send to the baroque lute list, isn't it?

Best regards
Markus

Am 05.03.2011 06:08, schrieb A. J. Ness:
    ----- Original Message -----

    From: "Christopher Wilke"<[1]chriswi...@yahoo.com>
    To: "wikla"<[2]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>; "A. J. Ness"
    <[3]arthurjn...@verizon.net>
    Cc: "Charles Browne"<[4]char...@brownecowie.fsnet.co.uk>; "Baroque
    Lute List"<[5]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 5:14 PM
    Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Ms. Lei. II 6 14 ?

    Arthur,
    --- On Fri, 3/4/11, A.  J. Ness<[6]arthurjn...@verizon.net>  wrote:
    >  By the way, did you notice that the Lachrimae motive is sounded in
    tghe
    >  lower line at the
    >  beginnig of Gallot's "L'Amat malheureux" (No. 98)? Weiss also made
an
    >  arrangement of that piece.
         It just so happens that in a few hours I'll be giving my
doctoral
    lecture recital at Eastman.  The topic is Weiss's use of timbre and I
    discuss these versions in my presentation.



    <<AJN>>  Good luck!  How I wish I could be there to hear you talk and
    play.  I once planned a talk on "L'Amat malheureux," but someone else
    on the program chose the same topic, so I had to move on. to
something
    else.  It wanted to relate it to the lament.   Anyway best of luck
with
    your lecture this evening.  In Kilbourne Hall?  (You know I studied
at
    Eastman.)  Opps! I meant to send this yesterday afternoon.  I am
    certain your presentation was a wonderful success.  I hope you will
    write it up for the Lute Society of America Quarterly, or its
Journal.

         I think this amply demonstrates why Arto is calling for more
    uniformity in naming as well as connecting names with catalog
numbers.
    There is the version of L'Amant Malheureux in London with the number
    LbmI, which is easy enough to find.



    <<AJN>>  Don't let me get started it's too close to dinner.  But the
    careless naming lute manuscripts is one of my pet peeves. And I join
    Arto in his complaints. Too often the names are not chosen correctly,
    and the incorrect name results in misunderstandings about the nature
of
    the works contained within the manuscript.  You'll have to let me
leave
    a list of examples for later.  I was discussing the topic with Steve
    Immel (proprietor of Old Music and Incunabula) at the recent annual
    meeting of the Music Library Association in Philadelphia.  And I
    purchased a facsimile of  "other half" of a misnamed lute manuscript,
    the Nauclerus Lute Book.  Not to be mistaken for the
Bakfark-Nauclerus
    Manucript which is misnamed.<g>  P.S. recte Bakfark-Nauclerus Codex



    <<AJN>>The Bakfark-Nauclerus manuscript has pieces attributed to "VB"
    (concordances show it is Valentin Bakfark) and MN, which the person
    naming the manuscript thought to be M. Nauclerus, because one pieces
    seems to read "M. Naucl."  But it read "Neud," an abbreviation  for
    Neusidler, whose authorship of the pieces attr. to "MN" can be
    confirmed through concordances as Melchior News idler (son, not
brother
    of Hans N.).

         But then there is the version in g minor in PnVmc61.  This is
the
    so-called "Paris" manuscript.  Not just the Paris manuscript, the
    "Paris Thibault" manuscript.  Not just the Paris Thibault manuscript,
    ONE of the Paris Thibault manuscripts.  I can't recall which volume
    number off the top of my head even though I've recently researched
it.
    This number is of course not connected with its current catalog
number.



    <<AJN>>  I have a guide to the Thibault manucripts on my web
    site.  [7]http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/thibault.html
        There are also the two versions (allemande en double and gigue)
in
    ROI.  The Deutsche Lautengelsellschaft recently published this as the
    "Rohrau" manuscript, but in English we're apparently calling it
    "Harrach I and II."  Tim Crawford has an excellent discussion of this
    source in a recent LSA Journal.  This is not to be confused (but
    undoubtedly will be by some) with the already known "Harrach"
    manuscript in New York.



    <<AJN>>The Pachelbel works in Nuremberg are also from Harrach, I
    believe, as well as sinfonias /concertinos in pitch notatoin that Bob
    Spencer owned. One is on my web site:

[8]http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/arthurjnesslutescores/sinfonia.ht
    ml



    Regards, Arthur.

    Chris
    Christopher Wilke
    Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
    [9]www.christopherwilke.com

    --

References

    1. mailto:chriswi...@yahoo.com
    2. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
    3. mailto:arthurjn...@verizon.net
    4. mailto:char...@brownecowie.fsnet.co.uk
    5. mailto:baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
    6. mailto:arthurjn...@verizon.net
    7. http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/thibault.html
    8.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepq31c/arthurjnesslutescores/sinfonia.html
    9. http://www.christopherwilke.com/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


--

Markus Lutz
Schulstraße 11

88422 Bad Buchau

Tel  0 75 82 / 92 62 89
Fax  0 75 82 / 92 62 90
Mail mar...@gmlutz.de



Reply via email to