Dear Mimmo, In my opinion there are two factors which need to be given priority even before judging the sound of a string. Firstly it has to be true (with no problems of intonation going up the fingerboard for stopped strings) and secondly it has to be playable: on a well-made and well set up lute, it must not catch on the nut, buzz, hit a neighbouring string, hit against the fingerboard, or cause any other extraneous noises. If a string has the potential to sound wonderful but does not meet these two criteria, then it is of no use whatsoever. Once that is established, obviously players want a string with a full-bodied and stable tone, enough sustain to make voice-leading a pleasure and the instrument to sing to the best of its ability and sufficient power to provide convincing projection and resonance. Personally I am looking for a warm and sweet tone with precise fundamentals and enough overtones to make the timbre rich and variable. Oh dear, that does sound like a holy grail doesn't it? Fingers crossed! Best Matthew
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 8:29, Mimmo Peruffo <mperu...@aquilacorde.com> wrote: > > Thank you for the suggestion Arto. > Unfortunately i cannot do it > I already image how confuse the thing will be with the customers. > This mean the eford to mannage twice products and honestly I do not > like to add cofusion in the factory and with customers already stressed > by me! > > I should do a choice and in fast time: is it better a more elastic > string like these are (whith problems related to the fact that maybe > stretch tooo much and that the sound is too bright) or it is better to > switch to a less elastic plastic support with the advantage that it > stretch less, the sound is darker and with less sustain? > Hard to do the choice: both solutions are ok; i already tried the > second option that is similar to the loaded gut strings > Even Anthony Bailes suggested me the second option. > > Strings or not to strings? this is the question > > ah ah > (my poor english at work) > Ciao > Mimmo > > ps > which are your suggestion guys? > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > From: Arto Wikla > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:46 PM > To: Mimmo Peruffo ; baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu > Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Baroque Lute Stringing > > Dear Mimmo, > > if you decide to make the loaded nylgut strings (CD) less elastic, I > hope (and wish and urge ;-) ) that you keep also the original elastic > version in your repertoire! They work exceptionally well on my Harz > arclute, great stuff. > > And big thanks for your invaluable work! > > Arto > >> On 02/02/17 14:03, Mimmo Peruffo wrote: >> Well, seeing this post I have the idea to switch to these stiffer > ones. >> at the end of the day they are closer to those loaded strings made of > gut. >> I will do some samples in advance. >> Mimmo > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > --
