On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > Once version 0.13 is building, I hope to add another build for CVS,
> > so that there will be a set of binary packages that follow along for
> > the latest CVS as well.  :-)
> 
> That would be great, as I can't create the src.rpm on CentoOS as
> autoconf and/or friends are too old.

Well, that might be an issue later on, once I have everything compiling
on OBS.  The .spec files on OBS have to be hacked up to support all
the differences across distros, and I'm not sure the resulting spec
file will "Just Work (TM)" on CentOS.

It would be nice if I could get it to that stage though, since then I could
just include the OBS spec file in the official release, and it would
compile everywhere.


> It would also be possible to get barry into RPMForge. The barry users
> only need to configure one additional repository and not RPMForge+OBS.

I doubt I'd have control over RPMForge, at least not to the extent that
I have with OBS.  I'd much rather have a downstream maintainer that can
be the point person for a particular distro.  I don't think it's my
place to become an official maintainer for all distros, but I'm more than
happy to help people who already are such maintainers with Barry.


> > Since CentOS has no opensync at all, maybe I can add those packages
> > to OBS as well.  The only reason Fedora 9 isn't supported for opensync
> > is that they have a conflicting version.
> 
> Yes, I understood. But as CentOS (or RPMForge) does not have opensync
> (yet?), I never used barry-opensync, so I won't miss it... I don't
> know how others are feeling about this, but I think getting opensync
> on RHEL/CentOS is not part of your work as barry developer ;)

You might be surprised at all the packages I have to deal with when
adding support in OBS.  These are due to limitations in OBS (they don't
have RPMForge there, for example) and limitations in specific distros
(some distros just don't have libtar) and limitations on package versions
(Debian doesn't have opensync 0.22 for example).  So I basically have
to touch all these dependencies anyway, it might just be simpler if I
do it all once, and the users can benefit. :-)

- Chris


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Barry-devel mailing list
Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel

Reply via email to