> On 17. May 2017, at 22:08, Harald Welte <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Vadim, >
Hey, >>> * remove 'talloc emulation' from osmocom-bb and use pseudotalloc from >>> libosmocore.git (plus an embedded 'malloc' like umm_malloc) >> >> Why do we need this hack (pseudotalloc)? > > Because talloc is large both in terms of runtime memory overhead (for > each allocation) and in terms of code footprint,. related to that. How confident are you we don't rely on the hierarchical feature of talloc inside the libosmo* (or your more narrow list)? Maybe we add some kind of runtime test/probe for that? holger
