Hi Holger,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Holger Freyther wrote:
> Just a quick update/note. I made some progress on the "mass" tests involving
> osmo-gsm-testerm/osmo_ms_driver, mobile, virtphy, osmo-bts-virtual and the
> rest of the infrastructure.
Thanks for pushing ahead here.
> There is one issue that I need to understand/resolve:
>
> ...
> lu_test: Tests done {all_completed=False, max=58.54871945299965,
> min=4.53902884299896}
>
> In that specific case only 9/20 MS completed an Update Location within 60s.
> Maybe I am missing a state transition in the LUA code and don't report the
> success. I will need to understand this better.
That's of course odd. But it should be rather easy to investigate if
looking at an Abis or A-interface trace? I think we recently had an
issue that we'd only use SDCCH for LU and never fall back to "bigger"
channels like TCH. Maybe that's limiting your LU rate, particularly if
you only have a SDCCH/4?
--
- Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
