Hi Harald,

I guess nobody else volunteered, or at least I have not seen any mails. So here 
is my take:
Thanks for the offer of hosting content on osmocom infra, I think that’s a good 
idea.
I would still like to keep the original domain, for sentimental reasons I 
guess, so what I’d propose is that I take ownership, pay the fees and for now 
just enable a redirect to the page hosted at Osmocom infra.
Maybe later I decide to use the domain for something else, but the osmocom page 
would still be up, providing info and serving up a trip down memory lane for 
people interested.

Let me know if this sounds OK.

Cheers,
Domi



> 19.01.2024 dátummal, 0:45 időpontban Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org> írta:
> 
> Hi Domi,
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:32:37PM +0100, Tomcsanyi, Domonkos wrote:
>> If nobody else wants it I would be happy to preserve it, [...]
>> 
>> I’d definitely try to host some info on it about the original project 
>> (possibly even get back all redmine pages from archive.org) and maybe use it 
>> for something else, still mobile networks + security related - nothing 
>> concrete in my head right now, just some general direction.
> 
> I think I'd be more than happy to offer some hosting space (container,
> lxc, whatever) on the osmocom infrastructure if anyone wants to create a
> page with historical data on/about airprobe.  This way, chances are high
> it will remain active/running for as long as the rest of osmocom does.
> 
> I just don't feel particularly compelled in paying annual domain
> registration fees for yet another domain, especially if that domain was
> not used "back in the day" and there are hence no links/URLs to
> preserve.
> 
> So IMHO the great work would be collecting information, but we could do
> that just as well under (e.g.) airprobe.osmocom.org without incurring
> extra cost.
> 
> In any case, if you want to take ownership of airprobe.org, it is of
> course entirely up to you to decide what you'd want to do there.
> Whether you'd want to host that on your own or on osmocom
> infrastructure.
> 
> Regards,
>    Harald
> --
> - Harald Welte <lafo...@gnumonks.org>          https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
>                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Reply via email to