Keith Ching wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting a peculiar stack trace upon trying to define the plugin. > do you think it could be caused by using Base2.2 classes in a Base2.1.1 > codebase? i tried to include the revised classes in the plugin JAR.. but > i suppose this probably doesn't work.. > > i had to include Base2.2 versions of > net.sf.basedb.core.Path > net.sf.basedb.util.FileExportOutputStream > net.sf.basedb.core.plugin.AbstractExporterPlugin > net.sf.basedb.core.plugin.ExportOutputStream > net.sf.basedb.core.plugin.ImmediateDownloadExporter > > do you think it would be safe to just replace these files in 2.1.1 > and rebuild it?
It is nothing that we recommend and we are not going to help you with any problems resulting from mixing two BASE versions. The immediate download functionality also depends on changes in JSP pages and other java classes. If you check ticket #189 (http://base.thep.lu.se/ticket/189) you can see all changes related to this issue. To get to the changes you have to look in the "Change history" list and find the links with numbers inside square brackets, for example: [2854]. /Nicklas > > -keith > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ The BASE general discussion mailing list basedb-users@lists.sourceforge.net unsubscribe: send a mail with subject "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
