Hi Cerstin, > However, your comment implicitly confirms that I can use index:facets() only > when the database is somewhat stable and not in constant flux as in our > scenario.
Yes thats true, in our scenario it is used to get a quick overview about a very large database and to configure the query frontend. However our data is not changing over time. Kind regards, Andreas Am 05.10.2012 um 18:54 schrieb Cerstin Elisabeth Mahlow: > Hi Andreas, > > I created all indexes as such and I clicked "optimize". I also closed the > GUI, opened it new, droped all indexes and did optimization again. > > However, your comment implicitly confirms that I can use index:facets() only > when the database is somewhat stable and not in constant flux as in our > scenario. > > Best regards > > Cerstin > -- > Dr. phil. Cerstin Mahlow > > Universität Basel > Departement Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften > Fachbereich Deutsche Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft > Nadelberg 4 > 4051 Basel > Schweiz > > Tel: +41 61 267 07 65 > Fax: +41 61 267 34 40 > Mail: cerstin.mah...@unibas.ch > Web: http://www.oldphras.net > ________________________________________ > Von: Andreas Weiler [andreas.wei...@uni-konstanz.de] > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 18:51 > An: Cerstin Elisabeth Mahlow > Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de > Betreff: Re: [basex-talk] index:facets() > > Hi Cerstin, > >> re-created all indexes > > which indexes did you re-created? > The information of index:facets is stored in the path index and therefore > only "optimize all" is > updating this index structure. > > -- Andreas > > Am 05.10.2012 um 18:46 schrieb Cerstin Elisabeth Mahlow: > >> Hi, >> >> after Andreas recommended using index:facets(), my application speeds up. >> >> However, I don't think that this is the best solution. The database, I >> apply this function to is changing constantly. As the function is using the >> index, I would have to re-create the index first, is this correct? So that >> the functions would give wrong results most of the time. >> >> And I found another strange thing: I had to delete some nodes and re-created >> all indexes. However, index:facets() still gives the information from the >> status *before* the deletion, i.e., it counts nodes that aren't there >> anymore. Therefore I don't use it. >> >> count(//entry/selected[text () = "yes"]) >> >> gives the correct result, >> >> index:facets("collect", "flat")//element[@name = "selected"]/entry[text() = >> "yes"]/@count/data() >> >> still gives the wrong result, i.e., the result that was correct some days >> ago. >> >> Is this a bug or a feature? >> >> Best regards >> >> Cerstin >> -- >> Dr. phil. Cerstin Mahlow >> >> Universität Basel >> Departement Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften >> Fachbereich Deutsche Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft >> Nadelberg 4 >> 4051 Basel >> Schweiz >> >> Tel: +41 61 267 07 65 >> Fax: +41 61 267 34 40 >> Mail: cerstin.mah...@unibas.ch >> Web: http://www.oldphras.net >> _______________________________________________ >> BaseX-Talk mailing list >> BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de >> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk > > _______________________________________________ > BaseX-Talk mailing list > BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de > https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk _______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
