Arg, my offline copy of the internal draft of XQuery was not up-to-date. Note to myself: always double-check the latest version when you write emails while traveling abroad... (note also I am pleased to hear that, because I was going to ask to reopen this, as it makes more sense to me as it is defined now :-P)
Sorry for the confusion. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ ----- Mail original ----- > De : Christian Grün > À : Florent Georges > Cc : BaseX Talk > Envoyé le : Dimanche 24 mars 2013 19h57 > Objet : Re: [basex-talk] Old EQName syntax > > Hi Florent, > >> The wiki page at http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Java_Bindings >> contains the following example: >> >> Q{java:java.lang.Math}cos(xs:double(0)) >> >> which if I am right is the old syntax for EQNames, which should >> be now: >> >> "java:java.lang.Math":cos(xs:double(0)) > > thanks for your mail. It’s actually the other way round: previous > versions of the spec. proposed the Clark notation (using quotes), but > the syntax was changed to the Q{...} syntax [1], in order to avoid > collisions with the future map syntax of XQ31: { "x" : "y" > }. > > Best, > Christian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/#prod-xquery30-BracedURILiteral > _______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
