Hi Christian, Thx, I tested it. It seems that a regression has been introduced : my main process, running in 30sec with 4 Go in memory with BaseX7.8 6aeaebf, never ended with this latest release. Indeed, it started disk-swapping as it is consuming more than 6 Go now (the size heap of my JAVA machine).
Do you have any clue, or suggestion, that could help us finding this regression ? Cheers, Jean-Marc 2014-01-30 Christian Grün <christian.gr...@gmail.com> > Hi Jean-Marc, > > you got it right, we fixed the bug! I've just updated the snapshot; > feel free to give it a try! > > Thanks, > Christian > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:07 PM, jean-marc Mercier > <jeanmarc.merc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As bug https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/839 has been closed, I > tried > > to upgrade from BaseX7.8 6aeaebf to BaseX beta_4cfa54c. > > Unfortunately, this bug still appears in 4cfa54c, and I rolled back > again to > > beta 6aeaebf . > > Did I misunderstoog something ? > > > > Cheers > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BaseX-Talk mailing list > > BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de > > https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk > > >
_______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
