Et voilà...

  https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/939
  http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/

Your feedback is welcome,
Christian



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Christian Grün
<christian.gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
>> XUST001 Updating function items are not yet supported
>>
>> when passing an updating function as a value. This used to work neatly from
>> 7.6 at least onwards.
>> I must admit that I'm pretty surpirsed and I'd like to ask where ni the docs
>> I could get more info on that.
>
> the behavior in 7.6 was not clean, which is why it was removed in more
> recent versions. However, the latest XQUF draft (not public yet) now
> provides an "updating" keyword, which can be used to invoke updating
> functions
>
>   UpdatingFunctionCall  ::=  "updating" PrimaryExpr "(" (ExprSingle
> ("," ExprSingle)*)? ")"
>
> Issue 939 will be closed as soon as we have implemented this in BaseX
> [1]. As an alternative, if you set MIXUPDATES=true in BaseX 8.0, you
> won't encounter any restrictions regarding the invocation of updating
> and non-updating functions.
>
> Christian
>
> [1] https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/issues/939

Reply via email to