Hi, Just my 2cts: We have a server running BaseX and configured to hold all data in memory (RAM=64GB). After collecting a few metrics, it turns out the bottleneck is the Cpu (100% and virtually no disk access) and unfortunately, BaseX only uses 1 cpu over the 8 the machine has.
Best regards, Gilles. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Grün Sent: lundi 19 mai 2014 10:40 To: the joj Cc: BaseX Subject: Re: [basex-talk] multi-core performance of BaseX Hi Roy, > I was wondering if anyone has some information about BaseX multi-core > performance. > > Does BaseX utilize multi-core architecture to parallel-process the Xqueries? There has been some discussion on the list in the past; see e.g.: http://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk%40mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg03076.html http://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk%40mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg03159.html http://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk%40mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg02018.html A general note: as BaseX is a full programming language, it is a non-trivial problem to compute arbitrary queries in parallel, and I'm not aware of any other XQuery processor that provides such capabilities. Disk access is often slower when done in parallel (in particular on conventional hard-disks), as parallel, uncoordinagted queries may lead to random access pattern. Potential solutions could be to provide... * functions for explicitly creating and joining threads * optimize special XQuery expressions for parallel executions. Hope this helps, Christian
