Hi all,

I've submitted a proposal to the issue tracker for XQuery 3.1. After
thinking about it for a while I realized that to me it appears quite
feasible to use the 3.1 array type to have something like fn:apply and
also keep the current semantics with for example the proposed arrow
operator. I hope that I could explain myself well enough. Let me know
if you think it makes sense.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26585

Cheers,
--Marc


On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Liam R E Quin <l...@w3.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:42:24 +0200
> Marc van Grootel <marc.van.groo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I will try to come up with a simple but representative example this evening.
>
> Note, if you are proposing a change to the XQuery languuage itself, the 
> XQuery WG and the XSLT WG are aware of limitations in our syntax and the fact 
> you can't call a function with a signature like fn:concat() using a function 
> item; a concrete proposal would for sure be discussed by the Working Groups 
> when they next meet jointly in September, although it is almost certainly too 
> late for XQuery 3.1. The way to get it considered is to file a bugillza 
> issue/bug; see www.w3.org/XML/Query for pointers to doing that.
>
> Liam
>
> --
> Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> W3C staff participant for XQuery
> Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/



-- 
--Marc

Reply via email to