Hi James, hi BaseX.app testers,

your suggestions make perfect sense to me.
I've adapted the build process accordingly and produced a new BaseX.app from 
yesterdays snapshot:

http://files.basex.org/releases/BaseX-latest.app.tar.bz2
http://files.basex.org/releases/BaseX-latest.app.info.txt

Thanks a lot for your feedback and testing
        Alex

On 02.09.2014, at 21:07, James Ball <basex-t...@jamesball.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> 
> Thank you for putting up the new build. I no longer get any warnings about 
> the source of the application so code signing must be working correctly.
> 
> I haven’t found any problems in the application itself either - key bindings 
> are working.
> 
> You may already have considered it and just not implemented the process yet 
> but it would be sensible to update a few of the fields in the Info.plist:
> 
> CFBundleIdentifier is currently set to org.basex - in case you ever release 
> any other applications, or bundle the server separately, I think this would 
> be better as org.basex.basexgui
> 
> CFBundleShortVersionString is currently set to 1.0. I think this should be 
> the ‘marketing’ BaseX version - in this case 8.0
> 
> CFBundleVersion is currently set to 1. I think this should be set to the 
> BaseX build number or similar. I think it has to be an integer but if not 
> then the number from the title bar would make sense (currently 274831e) or 
> perhaps the build date/time (2010827211717).
> 
> Thank you again for doing this.
> 
> Regards, James
> 
> On 29 Aug 2014, at 20:56, Alexander Holupirek 
> <alexander.holupi...@uni-konstanz.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi James, hi former BaseX.app users,
>> 
>> On 28.08.2014, at 23:22, James Ball <basex-t...@jamesball.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>>> http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/BaseX80-20140827.211717.app.tar.bz2
>>>> MD5 (BaseX80-20140827.211717.app.tar.bz2) = 
>>>> a6833cd5182286c94a91609aa0e34b0a
>>>> 
>>>> and give me some feedback on this.
>>> 
>>> Many thanks, I’ve download it and run it. So far so good.
>>> 
>>> If the Mac OS X app can be brought back I’ll be very happy. I know I can 
>>> just run the jar file but having it in my Applications is really useful and 
>>> so easy for anyone getting started.
>>> 
>>> I’ll keep using the version you linked to and get back to you if I find 
>>> anything odd.
>> 
>> I've just packaged the latest beta as a, now officially signed, BaseX.app.
>> 
>> In the next weeks I'll provide beta snapshots under the following URL
>> 
>> http://files.basex.org/releases/BaseX-latest.app.tar.bz2
>> 
>> The current one contains 'BaseX 8.0 beta 274831e' and is bundled with 
>> jdk1.8.0_20.
>> MD5 (BaseX-latest.app.tar.bz2) = 1dd1625d5352af6a02c7145318f40844
>> 
>> Please let me know if everything works for you (positive feedback will bring 
>> the BaseX.app back with the 8.0 release).
>> 
>> Thanks
>>      Alex
>> 
> 

Reply via email to