No Christian, really nothing special. Everything used to work neatly until Saturday when we tried 8.6.1 by just unzipping and launching. Btw we use Java 1.8.0_121 on both win7 and Ubuntu 16.04. Latest news same happens on Mac Sierra with Java 1.8.0_121. We've seen that there have been some commits recently on that parte of the code but I don't have a connection in my PC now ti check it in depth. Sorry. Ciao, Marco.
Il 28 feb 2017 10:49 AM, "Christian Grün" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi Marco, > > Hm, so it seems that the file is not deleted by the shutdown process. > I cannot reproduce this with the zip distribution on both Window 10 > and Ubuntu; have you changed anything in the configuration files? > > Christian > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Marco Lettere <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > -d doesn't add much info. > > But we've found out that the shutdown script hangs on a file > BasexHTTP8985 > > in the tmp directory. This happens btw on Windows 7 too. > > If we delete the file, while basexhttpstop is blocked, then basexhttpstop > > ends immediately and correctly. If we ctrl-c basexhttpstop then at the > next > > shutdown we get a FileAlreadyExists exception. > > > > Thanks for tour support. > > Marco. > > > > Il 28 feb 2017 12:05 AM, "Christian Grün" <[email protected]> ha > > scritto: > >> > >> Hi Marco, > >> > >> Could you please report back to us what exactly is output on the two > >> shells? Ideally, please run both commands with the -d flag. > >> > >> Thanks in advance, > >> Christian > >> > >> PS: Does it work with 8.6, 8.5.3 or older versions? > >> > >> > >> > >> > I just downloaded Basex861.zip for Linux (Ubuntu 16.04 the host). > >> > > >> > Unizipped and started basexhttp. Everything ok. > >> > > >> > In another shell I launch basexhttpstop which correctly shuts down the > >> > server started before. But basexhttpstop itself does not terminate. > >> > > >> > This is causing some headache in our scripts that launch and stop > >> > several > >> > instances. > >> > > >> > Any clue? > >> > > >> > Thanks a lot, > >> > > >> > Marco. > >> > >
