Re: [basex-talk] Synchronizing access to store

[Christian Grün]

>
> Sorry Christian, do you mean *not* synchronized?
>
With »synchronized«, I meant to refer to a lower level: You will not end up
with a corrupt key/value store or with I/O conflicts when accessing and
updating the store via multiple threads. However, as you have already
observed, multiple operations are not executed in a well-defined order, so
if you call store:get, store:put or store:write in the first process, a
second process will not wait until the store operations are completed.