On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Freddy Vulto wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to suggest that when we complete available options, we'd > > generally offer only the long options as completions if an option has a > > short option/alias/other counterpart and if it is known that the long > > option works well enough (basically if the long option takes no > > arguments, or takes an argument that can be separated with space (not > > only "=", but possibly both), it is ok). For example, if let's say -f, > > -F, and --foo are equivalent, we offer only --foo out of them when $cur = > > -*. > > +1 > Hadn't thought of it, but completing one-letter options makes little > sense indeed.
If there are no objections, I plan to start doing related cleanups later this week and document the practice in README's CONTRIBUTING section. _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
