On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:22:46AM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Sami Kerola <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  Makefile.am                    |  5 +++++
> >  configure.ac                   | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  shell-completion/Makemodule.am |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 shell-completion/Makemodule.am
> 
> Do we need './configure
> --disable-overwriting-bash-compilation-package-files'?

 Hmm... not sure, it's distro specific decision/policy.

 Maybe we need --disable-bash-completion, it should enough.

> I realized some of the files I wrote will conflicting with the

 Which files? We can add some info to ReleaseNotes to make it easy for
 distros.

> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=bash-completion/bash-completion.git;a=tree;f=completions

 What about to use .ul (or .util-linux) suffix for the conflicting
 files and in the bash-completion package check for these files and use
 it if exists? See for example:

  
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=bash-completion/bash-completion.git;a=blob;f=completions/umount

 CC: to [email protected], maybe they
 already have any idea how to resolve the conflicts between packages.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <[email protected]>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Bash-completion-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel

Reply via email to