We actually do have users on both Windows and Mac OS X. I'd like to hold off on c++11 for now until it becomes more widely adopted or we have a clear need for the features -- most of the new features can be implemented just as easily using Qt features (like QWeakPointer) for now.
On Thursday, August 25, 2011 10:44:19 PM ilusionoflife wrote: > What do you think about it? Should we use it? > I think yes, because we already use POSIX-only features, such as fork and > popen. Then compiler is nearly definitely gcc, so why not take advantage of > things like for(auto &key, container). > Now i am working on refactoring different classes and find, that new > features will simplify code. Your opinions? > > Best regards, illusionoflife > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K > The only unified storage solution that offers unified management > Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. > Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Basket-devel mailing list > Basket-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basket-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Basket-devel mailing list Basket-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basket-devel
