>>>>> "KL" == Keiron Liddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KL> Hi again, As you might guess this problem is related to the
KL> previous broken link problems.
KL> It appears in line 469 in ParsedURL that if the specified url on
KL> the element eg: <use xlink:href="file:ref.svg#FOP"
KL> transform="scale(1.5)" x="18" y="40"/>
KL> has a protocol then it ignores the base url and attempts to just
KL> use the url. From the spec it appears that the xlink:href can have
KL> a URI-reference which can be relative which of course is allowed
KL> to have a protocol. So it should ignore the base url only if the
KL> href is an absolute url. The presence of a protocol is not a
KL> relevant indicator.
I implemented this, but I was unable to track down the definitive
reference on relative URI's, does anyone know where that is?
I am particularly interested in what should be done if protocols
differ between parent and child URIs (this is the case that made me
originally decide that a protocol spec ment it was absolute) but am
also generally interested in what the true specification is to ensure
I haven't missed any other corner cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
