Keiron,

Keiron Liddle wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The main issue for me in this situation is not the actual change of
> interface but the problem of the getWidth (and some others) method which is
> no longer implemented.
> 

OK: thanks for telling us what your top priority is. I think Thierry
was planning to get back to you on how to deal with getWidth() as 
I beleive he thinks you could get things done another way, but I'll
let him speak for himself.

Could you give us a list of the other method which are temporarily
not implemented? This would let us prioritize which methods we should
tackle first when Stephane comes back.

> Ideally I want to change to batik1.1 when it is available and update the
> interface at the same time. Updating the interface is most likely (I hope)
> a simple task.

It should be.

> In this case I don't think there is any need for a backward compatible
> interface. The thing that I really want is the getWidth method to be
> useable when batik1.1 is released. This is a runtime compatibility issue
> that I was aware of soon after the change, I just haven't got around to
> raising the issue, preoccupied with some other areas. I suppose it could be
> useful for this sort of problem to also be made publicly known in a similar
> way that the interface changes are known.
> 

OK.

> As a side note:
> It would be good if the TextPainter system was easily extended so that for
> simple text that can be represented in pdf we put the text directly into
> the pdf and for more complicated text (effects, overline, underline etc.)
> the stroking text painter could handle it. Rather than the current
> situation where the stroking text painter can handle everything but makes
> large pdf files, the pdf text painter only handles simple text.
> 

I am not sure what you have in mind? An AbstractTextPainter of some sort
wich template methods for simple text?

Vincent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to