I like version 1.1's speed. I have an odd problem with one test (which didn't work correctly in earlier versions either). In the following file, both paths look the same in Adobe SVG 3.0; they look different in Batik. Who's right?
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 20001102//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-SVG-20001102/DTD/svg-20001102.dtd";> <svg width="310px" height="310px" viewBox="0 0 310 310"> <defs> <clipPath id="textClip" transform="rotate(60)"> <text id="text1" font-size="48pt" x="20" y="20" stroke="black" fill="none"> CLIP</text> </clipPath> <clipPath id="textClip2"> <text id="text1" font-size="48pt" x="20" y="20" stroke="black" fill="none" transform="rotate(60)"> CLIP</text> </clipPath> <g id="shapes"> <rect x="0" y="50" width="100" height="50" fill="#999"/> <circle cx="25" cy="25" r="25" fill="#666"/> <polygon points="30 0 80 0 80 100" fill="#ccc"/> </g> </defs> <g transform="translate(20, 20)"> <use xlink:href="#shapes" clip-path="url(#textClip)"/> </g> <g transform="translate(150, 20)"> <use xlink:href="#shapes" clip-path="url(#textClip2)"/> </g> </svg> -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
