On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 08:28, Vincent Hardy wrote: > > No, it's not a trivial change (I've played with removing methods > > enough to be fairly sure I know what the dependencies are). My > > preference is actually to rationalize the TextPainter interface but > > FOP probably wouldn't like that.... :) > > > > If we do what you have done for the method name change (implement > old and new methods for 1 release and then remove the old methods, all > that after sending a warning to the list) and make > sure that Keiron sees the warning message :-), then it seems ok to me > to go that route, but let's see what Keiron think, this may cause more > pain in FOP than I realize.
Sooner is better than later :) Those methods are not implemented properly anyway. It relies on the StrokingTextPainter to sort these those values out. I am hoping to improve the text painter use anyway, so that it properly selects to stroke or not depending on the text element. Currently it does a rather poor job, I noticed the bug while I was making a test example of various types of text elements. Keiron. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
