Thanks to Thomas. But we can't update to batik1.5 now for customer requirement. Would you like to tell me the detail about the bug? (which java file contain the bug? or what is the reason the bug injected?) so we may modify it to adapt jdk1.4.1. Thank you again.
--- Thomas E Deweese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> からの メッセージ： > >>>>> "H" == 呉 ゴウ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > H> When I use rasterizer batik1.1 with jdk1.4.1 ,I > find it can not > H> transfer to jpg correctly. Only a white jpg show. > > > This is due to a bug in Batik 1.1. This bug is > fixed in Batik > 1.5b4. While we haven't reached our goals for an > official Batik 1.5 > my assesment is that in general you are better off > using Batik 1.5b4 > than Batik 1.1. > > H> While i use jdk1.3 ,it transfer to jpg correctly. > And I find that > H> batik1.5 with jdk1.4.1 aslo works correctly. > Batik1.1 and batik1.5 > H> both works well with png file under jdk1.4.1. I > think it because > H> batik use its owner codec for png file while use > sun's codec for > H> jpg. So when I update my jdk form 1.3 to 1.4. > rasterizer does not > H> work well. Would anyone find a way to solve such > problem? > > My recomendation is to use Batik 1.5b4. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! BB is Broadband by Yahoo! http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
