Thomas DeWeese: > > There is currently no development under way to implement this. > >The initial implementation of use was wrong with regards to the > >spec and fixing this is non-trivial (and the need is usually not > >obvious). I > >have given thought to how it may be implemented properly but don't > >expect it to be fixed by the Batik committers soon. Contributions > >are always welcome.
Is the reason that the initial implementation is wrong is that the use'd elements are actually cloned and not just referenced, so that a simple getInstanceRoot function returning the element from the SVGOMCSSImportedElementRoot wouldn't be correct? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~clm/ // icq 26955922 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
