Thomas DeWeese: > I don't think it is a good idea to try and bundle variations for > various platforms, it is hard enough to maintain one good set of > reference images (this might actually argue towards not including > any reference images and have each person 'generate' there own > set of reference images from a known good copy of Batik). > > Anyway I would suggest downloading a clean copy of Batik 1.5.1 > run regard there with 1.4 (once we sort out the font problem) and > then just copy to candidate-variation files to your working copy > of Batik as 'accepted-variation' files.
Ok then. > For the font it appears to me that they are not including > the infinity char in the embedded symbol font. In this case > Batik will check every font installed on they system to try > and locate a font that is capable of displaying the character. > This is almost certainly why it is dying. Well spotted. :-) I take it that's not deliberate though. > You could easily check this by removing or replacing with an 8, > the character '∞'. This doesn't help much with identifying > the problem font though... There are a few generic sounding fonts in that package, such as a Helvetica; it could be the culprit. I'll try finding which one is the problem font tomorrow. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack | Web: http://mcc.id.au/ | ICQ: 26955922 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
