"Thomas DeWeese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This however is not why I have not implemented
> it.  The reason I have yet to implement it is that the spec is
> _very_ unclear on how it is supposed to work.

Stick with the old implementation as an extension until the WG provide a 
clear example of how it is supposed to work.

Jim. 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to