Stupid of me. Sorry. You're right. I'm currently seeing so many different URLs I don't really recognize them anymore. :-(
On 24.06.2005 11:38:44 Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > >>- href="http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-batik/";>latest > >>+ href="http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/batik/";>latest > > > > You should rather use > > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/ here! > > Otherwise, some people might end up downloading the whole repository > > including all branches and tags. > > You did notice that this is a viewcvs link right? No one is > going to be downloading anything from that link. > > Wouldn't it be best to point viewcvs at the root so people can > navigate as they want? Has experience shown that this just > isn't a good idea? So we should basically pretend that we have > just the branches/tags and not the higher level structure in 'public' > documentation. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
