Hi Clay. Web Maestro Clay: > Looks good. That's a lot of work you put in there! The Status page is > really cool! Nice work!
Thanks. > Here're a couple of my comments... (please forgive if they're > referenced below... > - I prefer the lighter page style used on XML Graphics & FOP sites > (see my skinconf.xml file to implement) The reason I prefer the darker skin is that I think it looks a bit strange (on the XML Graphics and FOP sites) with the menu having a white background and the unselected tabs at the top almost blend in to the white background. I guess it may be better to have a uniform styling, though. > - I prefer the breadcrumb trail in the location="alt" spot (under the > tabs instead of at the top of the page) I prefer them at the top. ;-) But again, maybe consistency should win... > - Development tab (dev/index.html) has no content & SMIL anim. page > 404 error > - dev/svg12/*.html Yeah I haven't written them yet. > - you may want to enable the PDF link (again, see my skinconf.xml) I did have it enabled before, but the FO that it must produce to generate the PDF needs some tweaking to look nice, and I didn't want to bother looking in to that. The status page, in particular, looked particularly bad. Perhaps that was because of the big tables styled in HTML by CSS, lacking styling in the FO. The status page also took several minutes to produce and ended up being over 100 PDF pages long! > > ['figure' references not followed] > I had the same problem. Since we didn't get validation errors the > <figure /> tag must be acceptable. Must be something else. Maybe > we'll have to change them all to <img />. I think I had validation turned off, but still, I think figure is allowed (it's in the document-v20 reference). Perhaps it's a bug in forrest. > BTW, I noticed you changed > the XML Graphics logo. I hope you didn't have to build that from > scratch. I think the SVG file is around somewhere. No I grabbed the SVG from the Commons repo and modified it a bit. I found that the text in the original one was a little hard to read, so I shuffled it around a little. The white text on the feather, when there is the dark background, helps legibility. It's hard to make the text have more contrast with the feather if there's a white background. I think that's another reason I preferred the dark skin for the site. > Let me know if you want help! Will do. Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ICQ: 26955922 cam (at) mcc.id.au MSN: cam (at) mcc.id.au http://mcc.id.au/ JBR: heycam (at) jabber.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
